I really agree with his view of the government subsidizing people to live in dangerous places. Why do people feel a need to build a house in a place which floods every time there is a storm/hurricane? Or build on the side of a mountain where mudslides are frequent. I get that everyone wants a "pretty" location, but the government shouldn't be paying for it.
The slide "Better Enviromental Messaging" makes so much sense to me. I found myself agreeing to all the points he was making about nationalism, security, etc. I think Economics should be a requirement for everyone (in every major, even High School) to learn to be better informed, especially as Presidential and Congressional electors!
No comments:
Post a Comment